If I understand this problem... for example when loading Moxie app into an
Flex2 app (using the same or child app domain, as nothing else is possible),
we can expect unpredictable problems, right?
IMHO the whole idea of separated ADs has very limited use now (or the
question if it has it at all...).

Adobe could solve this problem very easy - to enable something like
completely separated Flash Player instance inside another FP instance - with
its own Stage, etc. Of course, we would have to use local connection for
interoperability... but it would be OK.

Summary: The only solution in the presence is to use AJAX as a wrapper for
the modules, and LC or FABridge for interoperability, right?

P.S. So as for me it looks like another attempt to hurry up another release
to check item in glance press release. I do not want to be rude, I really
appreciate the great work all of you've done at adobe, but sometimes it is
very frustrating when you find out that another important feature is missing
- like  rendering inline images with html thath can't be fixed since FP v6
(correct me if I'm wrong)... Guys, doing great product isn't only presenting
new and new features but sometimes it means fixing bugs that exists for ages
...

On 15/06/07, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

   Planned, but not for 3.0.  There are known infrastructure issue in
getting popups, layout, focus and other things to interoperate when classes
are not shared due to AD boundaries.  For example, FocusManager expects
clients to be IFocusManagerComponent, but UIComponents in another AD are not
IFocusManagerComponent, they are [EMAIL PROTECTED] and thus
the main FocusManager won't work with them.



We want some player changes to make working with separate ADs easier, but
we can't do them in the 3.0 timeframe.


 ------------------------------

*From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Oleg Filipchuk
*Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2007 2:56 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] SWFLoader weirdness when using separated
applicationDomain



Thanks Alex.
May you explain reasons why this isn't possible?
Are there any plans of implementing such a behavior?


--
Best regards,
Oleg Filipchuk




--
Best regards,
Oleg Filipchuk

Reply via email to