Daniel, you are giving this guy advice based on software that hasn't been released to production yet - flex framework caching is a Flex 3 technology. Further, a simple image loader doesn't need the flex framework, regardless of whether the bulk of it will (eventually) be cached on the end users machine. There is nothing to be gained by using Flex for a dynamically generated image loader except a Flash 9 minimum player requirement + the flex framework requirement. Cheers, Steve
danielvlopes wrote: > No, flex is right tool for tha job. Look in internet for framework > caching and generate report for modularity compiling. > > Watch this video, this will reduce your swf file extremely. > http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flex/videos/flex3rsls/ > > The size of swf is because Framework is embeded in swf. I had project, > with giant codes and comps with 70kb. > > --- In [email protected], Steve Hagenlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Flex is probably not the right tool for that job. You should be >> > looking > >> at something like Ming (php module) or the MTASC open source project >> > for > >> compiling Flash. I'm sure there are several other options if you look >> around. When you use the Flex compilers, you get the Flex framework >> code as the price of entry. >> -Steve >> >> Ary wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i use mxmlc module (apache) to generate swf, its a >>> very simple swf only write a swf that has function to >>> load images externally, but the file size is 133 KB , >>> if i make the same procedure with flash and publish >>> it the file its only 20-30 KB. >>> >>> can i make the swf that rendered by mxmlc more simpler >>> and lighter? and is it possible to embed the image >>> inside the swf rather than link it to external file? >>> >>> >>> >>>
