In this case I'm confining that filter by using checkboxes so I'm okay there, but for future use... I'm not sure what you mean by "Expression Test"; can you explain a little more or show an example?
Thank You Mark --- In [email protected], "discoguy77" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Imagine "1,2,10,23". If you try and match "3", you will find it even > though it's just the "3" in "23". It might be better to do a more > advanced regular expressions test. > > --- In [email protected], "Mark" <pusateri02@> wrote: > > > > I got it - > > > > if (item.serviceLine.indexOf(checkBox.data) != -1){ > > isMatch = true; > > }... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Mark" <pusateri02@> wrote: > > > > > > I'm using a filterFuction filtering a few different fields. So > > far > > > so good, but I've been filtering on exact matches. How can I > > expand > > > that to search for LIKE or INCLUDES matchs, or something like > > that. > > > Here's what I have - > > > > > > 5 check boxes for the filter of one of the fields - lets say ( 1, > > 2, > > > 3, 4, 5) > > > My XML (arrayCollection) field had at one time, only 1 or 2 or 3, > > > etc. > > > > > > Now they want it to include more than just one, so that field can > > > look like more like - > > > 1 > > > 1,2 > > > 2,4 > > > 2,3,4 > > > 1,2,3,4,5 > > > ... > > > > > > So right now my filter is - > > > > > > if (item.serviceLine == checkBox.data){ > > > isMatch = true; > > > }... > > > > > > This would never return anything other than the check box marked > > > with the exact single value. > > > > > > How can I expand on this? I't still early in the game so I can > > > adjust the XML as needed if that works best. > > > > > > Help, > > > Mark > > > > > >
