ugh take a look at the release notes for FB3 Beta 2 and be sure you are looking at the released version of your SWFs, not the debug versions that are generated by default only now.
DK On 10/15/07, danielvlopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, i create a big project in flex using modules, RSLs and etc... > This project is real client, and he accept test flex in you website. > Everything works fine (ignoring the 500kb framework file it is > necessary for users to access the site.) > > Now i thinking use flex in small projects like simple websites, in old > versions of flex, like 3beta 1 or flex 2 swf files are smaller, like > 200kb or 130kb (not really small but acceptable). But now, with beta 2 > simple files came to 400kb. > > I becoming thinking i waste my time learning flex and waste the money > of my client testing flex in your app, I am already thinking about > redo the whole project in ruby on rails and ajax. > > If adobe and flex team does not begin to worry about the size of swfs > believe deeply that the flex will not last for a long time .... And > certainly I will have wasted time and money. > > :( > > This is the code i use for test size of swf: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > <mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; > layout="absolute"> > <mx:DataGrid/> > <mx:TileList/> > <mx:TextInput/> > <mx:TextArea/> > <mx:Form/> > <mx:FormItem/> > <mx:Button/> > <mx:ViewStack/> > <mx:Image/> > </mx:Application> > > > -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it?
