Hi,

 

We needed to update the RSL loading code to support this and it's
extensive enough that we're not going to be able to put that logic in
the Flex 2 SDK.  Sorry!

 

Matt

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Freiman
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 6:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex 2 Framework Caching?

 

Yeah, my question was opperating on the assumption that something will
go wrong.  Because in my experience no matter how good framework devs
are, it seems like upgrades always cause problems for someone's code (In
other words, I'm worried about that 0.1 percent you mentioned that will
need work).  And this time my code definitely has the potential to be
that code.  I haven't played with Flex 3 much yet, so maybe my app will
work perfectly in Flex 3.  If not, I'm not looking forward to bug fixing
my code base for Flex 3 (a pain which would be roughly related to the
size of the codebase).  Call if paranoia if you want.  I guess I'll find
out when I get there...or Adobe could decide to sign a Flex 2.0.1
framework RSL :)

- Dan Freiman

On 10/18/07, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

On Thursday 18 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know the Flex 3 sdk will be required for framework caching, but Flex
> Builder 3 can compile Flex 2 code.  If I chose this option will there
a
> digitally signed release of the Flex 2 framework. 

No, only Adobe can sign RSLs, and I haven't seen any indication they'll
do so
for a Flex 2 framework.

> upgrade my code to work with the Flex 3 framework just to gain this
> functionality. 

As far as I can tell, 99.9% of applications need no work to go from Flex
2 to
3.

> Also, it seems to me that developers with larger projects
> will have more incentive to create framework caching projects, but
will 
> also have the hardest time upgrading their project from flex 2 to 3
because
> of their large code base.

You change one option in Builders properties (or add a few arguments to
mxmlc), and it's done. 
How is this hard, or dependant on the size of the code base ?

--
Tom Chiverton. Are you a great Flex programmer, who knows Cairngorm, and
has
done some ColdFusion work ? Would you like to work for a top 30 law firm
in 
Manchester, UK ? Are not an agency ? If yes, send email !

****************************************************

This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office
address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list
of members is available for inspection at the registered office.  Any
reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of
Halliwells LLP.  Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority. 

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and
may be confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee
you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor
copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee
of its existence or contents.  If you have received this email in error
please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365
8008. 

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links 



 

 

Reply via email to