http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Parts&file=metadata_066_15.html
--- In [email protected], "simonjpalmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3 > and Java objects. > > I have a Java object > > package com.java > class X > { > private String name; > public String getName(){return name;} > public void setName(String name){this.name=name;} > } > > and an ActionScript object > > package com.as3 > { > [Managed] > [RemoteClass(alias="com.java.X")] > public class X > { > private var name:String; > private var age:Number; > } > } > > this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth > reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server I get > a warning message from the framework on the server which says... > > "Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could not be > found." > > This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily. Not a > problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age > contained an array of objects. > > What I think I need is something like the "transient" keyword in Java > object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for > persistence, or in this case transmission. > > Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this? > > Thanks >
