Hi, Thanks for the reply.

Like I said I have a ITreeDataDescriptor.

But I don't see how I can use that to disable the expand triagle for 
certain nodes.

Thanks
Dylan

--- In [email protected], "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Custom ITreeDataDescriptor
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of djdyland
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 8:41 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Tree: Removing expand triangle from select 
nodes
> 
>  
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm building a scripting reference app that is populated from an 
XML 
> file. The structure is something like this.
> 
> <groupOfAssociatedClasses name="name of container">
> <class name="className">
> <property name="propertyName">
> <type>theType</type>
> </property>
> <method name="methodName">
> <inputType>type</inputType>
> <returnValue>value</returnValue>
> </method>
> </class>
> <class name="className">
> <property name="propertyName">
> <type>theType</type>
> </property>
> <method name="methodName">
> <inputType>type</inputType>
> <returnValue>value</returnValue>
> </method>
> </class>
> </groupOfAssociatedClasses>
> <groupOfAssociatedClasses name="name of container">
> <class name="className">
> <property name="propertyName">
> <type>theType</type>
> </property>
> <method name="methodName">
> <inputType>type</inputType>
> <returnValue>value</returnValue>
> </method>
> </class>
> </groupOfAssociatedClasses>
> 
> I created a tree discriptor to filter out all the children on each 
> class so it doesn't display them in the tree. All I want to see in 
> the tree is the names of the containers and the names of the 
classes.
> 
> My proplem is that beucase the classes have children flex is 
> displaying the expand node triangle beside the icon which ends up 
> doing nothing becuase of the filter. How can I get rid of the 
expand 
> node triangle?
> 
> I tried to turn it off but it ended up turning it off for the 
parent 
> container nodes as well.
> 
> Any Help is much appreciated :)
>


Reply via email to