Is it a new object? Or just an object pointer of the specified type?
I.e., are there now 2 memory locations or just one memory location?


On Nov 9, 2007 6:50 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>    I think of it as casting, but I believe it really is a function call
> that returns an object of that type
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *ben.clinkinbeard
> *Sent:* Friday, November 09, 2007 6:03 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [flexcoders] Re: Casting in flex
>
>
>
> Good point Alex, I guess conversion does occur when dealing with
> primitives. As for there being no casting in AS, how would you
> describe what happens with complex types? Like dog = Dog(animalArg)
> from below.
>
> Ben
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Alex
> Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Excellent description of casting, but IMHO, there is no casting in AS.
> > Using a function to 'cast' like Number("5") actually does do a
> > conversion in some cases as does 5.5 as int
> >
> >
> >
> > To the original question, your data should be converted to Position
> > objects automatically if you got set up correctly. I'm not an expert in
> > that area, but RegisterClassAlias should be part of the solution.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
> > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 12:29 PM
> > To: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Casting in flex
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, casting does not actually convert anything from one type to
> > another. Casting simply allows you to refer to an object by a type
> > that it already is, but that its not specifically defined as.
> >
> > I know that sounds confusing, so let me explain a bit. You could have
> > a method that accepted an argument of type Animal, because you want to
> > be able to send any subtype of Animal to the function, such as Dog,
> > Cat, Fish, etc. Inside that function, if you wanted to call methods
> > that were specific to the subclass passed in, you could do a check and
> > then a cast. So maybe the method body would look like this:
> >
> > animalArg.feed();
> >
> > // specific actions
> > if(animalArg is Dog){
> > var dog:Dog = Dog(animalArg);
> > dog.walk();
> > }
> > else if(animalArg is Fish){
> > var fish:Fish = Fish(animalArg);
> > fish.flush();
> > }
> >
> > Also, I don't think the as operator is exactly the same as a cast but
> > its very similar and I don't feel like looking up the difference right
> > now. My suggestion would be to convert your objects when the result is
> > returned and then not have to worry about casting them later. You can
> > just make the Position class constructor accept an Object and pull the
> > properties off of it.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Ben
> >
> > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > , "luciddream54321" <asoltys@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm working with Arash on this project. Thanks for the suggestions
> > > but even using these alternate methods for geting the selectedItem the
> > > cast to a Position object still fails.
> > >
> > > Our dataProvider is an ArrayCollection that is populated by a
> > > ColdFusion query returned from a RemoteObject call. The query rows
> > > are from our positions table but flex is storing the rows as generic
> > > 'Objects' within the ArrayCollection. Here is the line we use in our
> > > RemoteObject result handler:
> > >
> > > positions = event.result as ArrayCollection;
> > >
> > > Using the debugger we've been able to verify that the Objects in the
> > > ArrayCollection do have the same public properties as our Position
> > > value object.
> > >
> > > So is it necessary to convert the query rows into Position objects
> > > immediately when they come back from ColdFusion rather than casting
> > > them after we get them out of the ArrayCollection? How would this be
> > > done exactly?
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "ben.clinkinbeard"
> > > <ben.clinkinbeard@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I assume your dataProvider is a collection of Position objects? Is
> > it
> > > > an ArrayCollection?
> > > >
> > > > Try changing this line
> > > >
> > > > selectedItem = event.currentTarget.dataProvider[selectedRow];
> > > >
> > > > to this
> > > >
> > > > selectedItem =
> > event.currentTarget.dataProvider.getItemAt(selectedRow);
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > Ben
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "arashafrooze" <arash.afrooze@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I'm a flex newbie, so please bear with me ...
> > > > > I have an advanced datagrid with a change property that calls a
> > > > > function passing it the event.
> > > > > inside the function i retrieve the selected row and cast it as an
> > > > > object. then i try to cast this object as, what i call a Position
> > > > > object. Even though both objects are identical in properties, My
> > > > > postion object does not get populated and is assigned NULL.
> > > > > I'm pasting the code to my function.
> > > > > Any help is greatly appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > public function updateSelectedPosition(event:Event):void
> > > > > {
> > > > > var position:Position = new Position();
> > > > > var selectedItem:Object;
> > > > > var selectedRow:uint = event.target.selectedCells[0].rowIndex;
> > > > > selectedItem = event.currentTarget.dataProvider[selectedRow];
> > > > > position = selectedItem as Position;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you all so very much in advance :D
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
~~
http://www.lifesabirch.org

Reply via email to