Is there anyway to judge what level of user connections a given server can handle without requiring specialized loadsharing strategies? In a non-audio or video environment what's it take to stream an AS3 based swfs to 3-5 dozen connections?
On 10/16/07, Anatole Tartakovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would try to see if you can scale application in any other way - 4 > core single CPU and removal all business functionality to different servers > is always an option. You might get even better scalablity by going RTMP > route or provide pseudo-connectivity wrapper using non-blocking IO via > client - proxy - LCDS - Messaging - LCDS - proxy -client pish. > > Regards, > Anatole > > On 10/16/07, Bruce Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, I'm using HTTPService right now with E4X results. The for large > > data results, however, XML is not desirable. > > > > I'd prefer to use some framework that uses AMF3 in order to get more > > compact results. > > > > Bruce > > > > > > On 10/16/07, Jeff Schuenke <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > You can also just use HTTPService to do direct HTTP requests. I am > > > using this for communications with a JAVA backend. > > > > > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "Bruce Hopkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > All I want to do is have my Flex client to communicate with my Java > > > backend. > > > > Due to licensing restrictions, LCDS won't be an option for us. So > > > far the > > > > biggest contenders are: > > > > > > > > 1. Granite Data Services > > > > 2. OpenAMF > > > > 3. WebORB > > > > 4. Red5 > > > > > > > > Does anyone have any strong opinions, suggestions, or biases on > > > either of > > > > these solutions? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Bruce > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
