To sum it up, am I correct in my conclusion that it's impossible to have a vertical scrollbar without a horizontal scrollbar on any container that contains any component with the right='something' attribute set?
I hope I'm wrong, that's annoying as hell. -Josh On Nov 15, 2007 5:35 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > As long as it is small enough to not cause the hbar to come on > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Josh McDonald > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 4:52 PM > > > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Vertical scrolling without horizontal scrolling? > How do I make 100% == 100% of available width? > > > > > > > > Does it have to be 0, or can I go with something like 200 or so? It > irks me that when you shrink the browser window you get a million > scrollbars in every nested container :) > > I know I'm probably a pain, but I'm determined to master Flex. > > -Josh > > On Nov 14, 2007 5:45 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think you want the content to use 100% but have minWidth=0. You're > > hitting an obscure 'rule' of flex that we don't shrink containers when > they > > decide to put up scrollbars else it could propagate scrollbars down to > its > > children. Also, if or when you know you want scrollbars, changing the > > policy to "on" will factor the scrollbars into the layout. minWidth > usually > > solves it though. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Josh McDonald > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 11:13 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Vertical scrolling without horizontal > scrolling? > > How do I make 100% == 100% of available width? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The content is set up to be in some cases 100%, otherwise it's > > anchored to top/bottom/sides. > > > > If I have the container (vbox) anchored to the bottom of the > > application, or no height specifcation at all, or any %, it simply > > grows out and i get the dual scrollbars. If i specify a pixel height, > > the container itself gets a scrollbar and everything works fine. Is > > there no way to have a container that has an "anchored to the > > application" minimum size, but will scroll internally if it needs to? > > I imagine setting the height to a pixel size when the application > > detects a resize would achieve the results I'm after, but that's > > awfully kludgey. > > > > I feel like I'm trying to do CSS-based design in HTML :-/ > > > > -Josh > > > > On Nov 14, 2007 4:49 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the content need to fill the width of the container? If it does, I > > > think you'll always get an hbar since even narrowing it would obscure > > > content. > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, try setting minWidth=0 on the content items and maybe the > > > container as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > Behalf Of Josh McDonald > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:24 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Vertical scrolling without horizontal scrolling? > > How > > > do I make 100% == 100% of available width? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I'm having a problem where as soon as my content goes taller than a > > > container (be it the application, or a panel) and a vertical scrollbar > > > is needed, it simply covers up some of the container rather than > > > narrowing it. This of course creates a horizontal scrollbar as well. > > > Is there an easy way to get around this? It's really the last thing I > > > want, and to me seems like the last thing anybody would want. I'm sure > > > it's something simple, but it's just one of those things that appears > > > difficult to google for :) > > > > > > Any help appreciated :) > > > > > > -Josh > > > > > > -- > > > "This is crazy! Why are we talking about going to bed with Wilma > > > Flintstone... She'll never leave Fred and we know it. " > > > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > > > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > "This is crazy! Why are we talking about going to bed with Wilma > > Flintstone... She'll never leave Fred and we know it. " > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > > "This is crazy! Why are we talking about going to bed with Wilma > Flintstone... She'll never leave Fred and we know it. " > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- "This is crazy! Why are we talking about going to bed with Wilma Flintstone... She'll never leave Fred and we know it. " :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
