Not Mac, but hope this helps...
 
For eclipse we use Subclipse.  It's ok--get's job done--but a lot of times
when we want to use more advanced features of Subversion we feel it's easier
to open Windows Explorer and use TortoiseSVN.  
 
In Visual Studio we use VisualSVN which is a TortoiseSVN wrapper.  It's very
nice except for the icons.  Integrates into Visual Studio very nicely and
has full access to SVN features in clean interface and nice presentation
(largely due to piggy backing on TortoiseSVN).  
 
In the past we've used PushOK's SVN SCC provider for Visual Studio
integration.  This is an actual SCC API implementation so would work with
any product that follows the MS SCC API standards (all MS ide product and
many third party like Borland and Sapien).  This was a little buggy, always
gave the impression of being poorly written, and since it followed the SCC
API it was the Visual Source Safe model and didn't map to SVN very well (VSS
uses checkin/checkout model whereas SVN/CVS is change/merge).  At the time
(prior to VisualSVN), PushOK SVN SCC was best option.
 
One of our developers used a Mac for a while and was frustrated with lack of
a good comparable GUI to TortoiseSVN.  He eventually switched back to
Windows (for a variety of reasons).  He just got a new Mac though, so he may
be revisiting that decision.  ;)
 
Sam
 

-------------------------------------------
We're Hiring! Seeking a passionate developer to join our team building Flex
based products. Position is in the Washington D.C. metro area. If interested
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

 


  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gordon Smith
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 1:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] Subversion clients


What Subversion clients do you use, and what do you like or dislike about
them? I'm especially interested in opinions about GUI clients on the Mac.
 
Gordon Smith
Adobe Flex SDK Team

Reply via email to