yes; actually what i thought was explicit definitions will be enough.(like in java) more specifically, there are too many VO's in the application (cairngorm). i tried importing every class VO one by one, but it did not solve the problem, i again had to ctrl+space. i made a diff on the frontController (after and before ctrl+space); what it does is just removing some of the imports (although they are valid). after it, all errors in the frontController goes but there are errors in the VO's so i can not be sure whether it fixed the frontController or not.
since the project is confidential, i can not send code here :( anyway we changed our implementation and removed duplicate name classes and the errors are gone; thanks in advance... On Dec 3, 2007 8:17 PM, Mike Morearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are probably omitting the "import" statement -- you are probably > assuming that since you explicitly qualified the class name, the > "import" is not necessary. In Java, if you explicitly qualify a class > name in your code, then you don't need to have an "import" statement > at the top of the file. But Flex is different: You still need the > "import". When you do ctrl+space, the import gets inserted for you, > so that's probably why that case works. > > - Mike Morearty, Flex Builder team > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, yigit > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > hi all; > > in my cairngrom application, i have many classes and some of them has > > the same name but of course diffrent packages. > > > > i autogenerate code, so to not to let ambiguity, i alway use classes > > with their packages. > > e.g. > > instead of writing var foo:Foo; > > i write var foo:tr.com.sth.vo.Foo; > > > > the compiler give and interesting error, saying that con not recognize > > tr (my initial package name); > > but when i go to the end of > > tr.com.sth.vo.Foo and press ctrl+space > > after waiting seconds, and rebuilt; the error goes! (without any change > > in the source). > > i'm using beta2 on eclipse. > > > > i think the compiler gets confused, but what can be the reason for > this, > > are there tips to overcome?? > > > > thanks... > > > > >
