No, this is not the case im afraid.
Sometimes the module loads perfectly and the application is fine, but
sometimes the application throws the error i mentioned in the first
post.
I catch the main error being thrown by the module loader ('SWF is not
a loadable module'), but when this occurs the ModuleManager.as class
(from the Flex framework) always throws an error at line 669:
The code at this line is:
moduleEvent.bytesLoaded = loader.contentLoaderInfo.bytesLoaded;
I have changed the code in ModuleManager.as to now point to the
correct object - the event.currentTarget.loader property - (so that a
null pointer error is not thrown):
moduleEvent.bytesLoaded =
event.currentTarget.loader.contentLoaderInfo.bytesLoaded;
I am not sure how to compile the application (or perhaps rebuild the
framework.swc file with the new source code) with the changes
Either way, the module is not loading properly in a consistent
manner, and i am totally confused as to how this would be happening.
--- In [email protected], "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is it possible it isn;t a module
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Barry Evans
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 3:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] ModuleLoader 'SWF is not a loadable module'
Error
>
>
>
> I am having a problem with a modularised application i am
developing.
>
> I am using modules to load a user-customised application and i am
> getting intermittent errors when loading a certain module (SWF is
not
> a loadable module).
>
> Having scoured the internet for details of the error, i can only
find
> answers where the problem is to do with security issues (loading
> modules from different domains/crossdomain.xml etc.).
>
> I am loading all my modules from a relative path
> (/modules/navigation/Linksmodule.swf) so security should not be an
> issue.
>
> I would really appreciate some help with this anyone might have as
i
> am reaching a release date for the project and i cannot get by
> without solving this problem.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Barry
>
