Hi Ralf,
nice idea, thanks!
- Nils.
Ralf Bokelberg wrote:
> You can use full qualified event names to avoid name clashes, eg.
>
> package de.bokelberg.bigproject.myview
> {
> class UpdateEvent extends Event
> {
> public static const EVENT_ID : String =
> "de.bokelberg.bigproject.myview.Update";
> //...
> }
> }
>
> Cheers
> Ralf.
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 2:22 PM, Nils Millahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I've started using Cairngorm on a couple of projects and wondered where
>> people generally define their event type identifiers.
>>
>> The FrontController/EventDispatcher setup requires unique event names
>> across the application, which is hard to control on large projects with
>> multiple developers (or when further development is done at a later stage).
>>
>> So I'm thinking that it would be easier to define event names as 'static
>> const' in a single class 'CairngormEventNames, which in turn could be
>> used in the specific event classes. A bit cumbersome but easier than
>> going through each event class and checking that event names don't overlap.
>>
>> What is everybody else doing in this respect?
>>
>> cheers - Nils.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
