hmm. Vo's composed of other VO's should work. Make sure on the PHP side that the var is public.
I use the explcitType option.... so this should be set in all your VO's on the PHP side... public static $_explicitType = "UserVO"; Also, If you are returning a VO from PHP that has not been instantiated at least once on the flex side. Flex will leave it as an Object when it receives it from PHP. steve --- In [email protected], "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well removing the full class path from my aliases in flash/php seemed to fix > it for me. > Much simpler also. > > I am having problems though getting a nested VO sent to php back into flex. > For > example, I have a UserVO as the primaryContact in my AccountVO and its > throwing type > coercion error in flex coming back. When loading the nested VO initially it > works fine. > > Any ideas? > > > --- In [email protected], "sgrace99" <sysco@> wrote: > > > > I use AMFPHP no issues here... my Objects transfer just fine.... > > > > 1.Have you registered the class alias in your UserVO.as? > > > > import flash.net.registerClassAlias; > > [RemoteClass(alias="UserVO")] > > > > > > 2.My service calls in my delegates look like this..... > > > > public function getUser(vo:UserVO):void > > { > > var token:AsyncToken = this.service.getUser(vo); > > token.addResponder(this.responder); > > } > > > > 3. Did you set the classMappingsPath in gateway.php? > > > > $gateway->setClassMappingsPath("my/path/to/voDir/"); > > > > > > .... > > steve > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "JWOpitz" <jwopitz@> wrote: > > > > > > an update to this: > > > > > > I ended up dropping the casting to the UserVO.php. So the function > > > signature looks like: > > > > > > function getUser ($user){} > > > > > > rather than > > > > > > function getUser (UserVO $user){} > > > > > > then inside the new function I set the type to an object using: > > > > > > settype(&user, "object"); > > > > > > this allows the php function to be able to retrieve the object > > > propeties such as $user->name or $user->password since it sees it as > > > an object rather than the array flex likes to send. > > > > > > Though this works, it doesn't sit well with me because I thought the > > > whole idea of remoting was to be able to pass classes around without > > > having to do these kind of work arounds. > > > > > > If anyone has any ideas on this, please give me a shout. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > J > > > > > >
