There might be metadata and debug information that doesn't get cleaned out of RSL SWFs. Make sure you're building a production SWC.
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rueter007 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Interesting problem with swf and swc sizes. I am aware of this and it is part of the reason why I am trying to create RSLs. --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , Sherif Abdou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i thought player 115 has some type of caching thing so first time it runs it downloads the flex swc and everything needed so next time a user loads the website it goes even faster or am i talking bout the wrong thing. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: rueter007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:47:36 PM > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Interesting problem with swf and swc sizes. > > ran the optimizer on playerLib.swf. no reduction in size. :-(. > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Gaurav Jain" <gauravj@ > wrote: > > > > It sounds like the playerLib.swf may not be optimized. Can you try > > running optimizer command on playerLib.swf? > > > > Thanks, > > Gaurav > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping <http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping> >
