Just correcting myself. "I DON'T think we can bind internal classes in actionscript."
On Feb 4, 2008 5:36 PM, Jhonny Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using JAXB to generate POJOs too, it's working fine. I have even > written an Air application to automatically generate actionscript code from > Java generated code. You must have a look at jaxb annotations to solve the > problem of custom code. > > Some tips: > > Use the following annotation on root of your schema to make the xjc to > generate ArrayList instead of vectors, and (optionally) define a java > package. > <xs:annotation> > <xs:appinfo> > <jxb:serializable/> > <jxb:globalBindings collectionType="java.util.ArrayList"> > </jxb:globalBindings> > <jxb:schemaBindings> > <jxb:package name="br.al.gov.bou.modelo"/> > </jxb:schemaBindings> > </xs:appinfo> > </xs:annotation> > > As i'm using Red5, the data binding requires all pojos to have all gets > and sets, so if it's your case use "JAXB 2.1 Collection setter Injector > Plugin" (https://jaxb2-commons.dev.java.net/collection-setter-injector/) > because xjc only generate getter methods on collections. > > Another important thing is the use of complexType in EVERYTHING, to avoid > java internal classes generation. I think we can bind internal classes in > actionscript. > > Hope i've helped. If you are interested in the application to generate > actionscript from java code say so that i'll send to you. > > > -- > Jhonny Everson -- Jhonny Everson
