Please, ignore - i've seen the answer already, sorry
--- In [email protected], "andrii_olefirenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> BTW, does it mean that I can't compile application that uses charting
> components without watermarks using Ant script (without Flex Builder
Pro)?
>
> --- In [email protected], Matt Chotin <mchotin@> wrote:
> >
> > Removing license.jar means you won't be able to remove the charting
> watermark if you choose to go Pro.
> >
> > I'm sure there are holes in license.jar, just like there are holes
> in any licensing system. We do what we think is reasonable and then
> trust that most folks will be honorable and pay for their license (or
> receive a license through otherwise legitimate means).
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > On 3/3/08 7:08 AM, "andrii_olefirenko" <andriyo@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I guess Adobe Flex engineers did better work protecting their stuff by
> > making it open source :)
> > as for sdks\3.0.0\lib\license.jar - i've just deleted this jar and my
> > laptop didn't blow up - am I chosen one?...
> >
> > Andrii Olefirenko
> >
> > --- In [email protected]
>
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> , "Oleg Filipchuk" <justversus@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Guyz,
> > > there are still holes in licence.jar in particular sdks -
> > > sdks\3.0.0\lib\license.jar and sdks\2.0.1\lib\license.jar.
> > > I guess that Adobe Flex engineers could implement better way to
> > secure their
> > > work.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Oleg Filipchuk
> > >
> >
>
