Nope, should be fine. Just keep in mind that all of the windows are children of MDICanvas (or whatever container you've designated) so if you want something behind all of them you might want to just move it behind the container. Hope that makes sense.
Ben On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Pan Troglodytes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the response, Ben. > > Not actually looking for modality. Just making sure there isn't any > gotcha that I should worry about if I put controls behind the windows. > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:30 AM, ben.clinkinbeard < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Jason, > > > > Sorry for the slow response time, I've fallen way behind on > > flexcoders. The latest release is compatible with 2.0.1 HF1 and > > beyond. There currently is nothing geared towards modality in FlexMDI > > but it has been requested. Not sure if it will happen or not. > > > > Ben > > > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Pan > > Troglodytes" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ben & company - very cool library. Just got a couple of questions. > > > > > > 1) Is there anything to worry about when using this with the Flex 3 > > beta 3 > > > sdk? I just switched the SDK it wanted and it seemed fine. But I > > thought > > > I'd ask in case there was anything a little non-obvious. > > > > > > 2) I'm planning on using this to manage popup windows in front of my > > > application. So I'd have a regular application with trees and tabs and > > > such, and these windows would pop up in front of it. So far that looks > > > feasible. I might have to change it so that the disabled windows > > are a bit > > > more opaque. But other than that it seems fine. Is there anything > > I should > > > watch out for here? > > > > > > Thanks for all the work you've put in. > > > > > > -- > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jason > >
