Ah yes, I knew there was a way to do this with the swc. Thanks, -Alex ________________________________
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VELO Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:57 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Module Size Issue Can I add this to MXMLC: -compiler.external-library-path+=flex/libs/framework.swc ? Or is better use load-extern? VELO On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:aharui%40adobe.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Actually a good question. I thought we'd changed load-externs to take a > SWC, but it looks like that didn't happen. It turns out you can use the > catalog.xml from the SWC though. > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of Marvin Froeder > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:15 PM > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Module Size Issue > > > > > > > > > Stupid question. > > Where can I get the framework link-reports? > > VELO > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:aharui%40adobe.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Yup, list it twice in the compile options or comma-separate. Most MXMLC > > options handle both ways > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > > Behalf Of Marvin Froeder > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 5:19 PM > > > > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Module Size Issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I do that? Load 2 externs? > > > > Amazing!! > > > > Looking at mxmlc I saw that: > > -load-externs <filename> > > > > Just one parameter. How do I load both? > > > > VELO > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:aharui%40adobe.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You would load-extern both the framework.swc and the app. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > > > Behalf Of VELO > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 3:24 PM > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Module Size Issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I am curious... > > > > > > I have my Application (without RSL) and my Module. > > > At this condition I use link-reports/load-extern. > > > To compile the module I load extern the link-reports from the > > > application. Right? > > > > > > When I start to use this application with framework caching (with RSL) > > > I will begun the load-extern from the framework.swc e no more from > > > myApplication? > > > > > > At current time, I can load-extern from only one source. But isn't > > > better I load-extern the framework.swc AND my Application? > > > > > > VELO > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:aharui%40adobe.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you turn on the framework rsl cache? If so, you then have to > > > > load-extern framework.swc on your modules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] > On > > > > Behalf Of Jehanzeb Musani > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:17 AM > > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Module Size Issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I have designed an application that loads features > > > > (implemented as modules) at runtime. I want to > > > > minimize the size of the modules so I am using > > > > "link-report" and "load-externs" compiler options for > > > > main applicaiton and features respectively. > > > > > > > > A couple of days before, report.xml generated by > > > > link-report compiler option was of 344 KB and includes > > > > links to my custom libraries too. Now when I am > > > > compiling the main application (after updates have > > > > been incorporated to main application and features), > > > > the size of the report.xml is only 16KB. I am > > > > attaching both report.xml files; reportPrev.xml > > > > (644KB) and reportNew.xml (16KB). Moreover, if I am > > > > using the previous report.xml file to link during the > > > > compilation of features, the size of the resulting swf > > > > of the feature is 0 KB. > > > > > > > > Can anyone tell me what can be the reason for that? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jehanzeb > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > > > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > > > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs <http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs> > > > > > > > > > > > >
