And I would but trace(dg.columns[0]) // undefined
--- In [email protected], "Rick Winscot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> After you set the data provider there isn't any reason that you
can't:
>
>
>
> dg.columns[0].headerText = "ColumZOR Heading";
>
>
>
> When dataGrid-ing. there will be a few items that you will need to
provide
> no matter what path you go down (dynamic, mxml, design time,
runtime ).
> Column headings is one of them - since columns don't know where to
pull
> headerText from (i.e. a function, field, attribute, etc) by
default.
>
>
>
> Rick Winscot
>
> All your e4x are belong to us..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of markgoldin_2000
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 12:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Loop thru XML data
>
>
>
> Very interesting!!
> I am assigning data like this:
> dg.dataProvider = xmlData.elements("location");
> where xmlData fragment is:
> <location>Departure Yard</location>
> <location>West Class</location>
> <location>East Class</location>
>
> I see my data in one column but the column does not have a header
> text. Also dg.columns.length() shows 0. But I would think it must
be
> 1. What am I missing here?
> Can you provide a sample of an XML that will create columns as well
> as populate grids with data in your one linner code?
>
> Thank a lot.
>
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Rick Winscot" <rick.winscot@>
> wrote:
> >
> > To Tracy *The Man With Loopage*:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you just take the original output from that one liner and send
> it to the
> > provider of a datagrid with no columns - the data will magically
> flow into
> > the grid without having to create columns! He might need to tweak
> the
> > structure of his xml so that the columns look right though.
> >
> >
> >
> > BAM!
> >
> >
> >
> > Rick Winscot
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com> ]
> On
> > Behalf Of Tracy Spratt
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:05 PM
> > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Loop thru XML data
> >
> >
> >
> > As I read his post he really does want to loop, so he can use the
> iterations
> > to build DG columns dynamically.
> >
> >
> >
> > It I am correct then take Rick's e4x expression, punk, and do
this:
> >
> >
> >
> > var xlColumns:XMLList = xml.destinationcodecolumns.elements
("code");
> >
> > var xmlColumn:XML;
> >
> > for (var i:int=0;i<xlColumns.length();i++) {
> >
> > xmlColumn = xlColumns[i];
> >
> > //. do whatever
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > But now, reading the original post again, maybe this is not what
he
> wants.
> > But I already wrote this response, it so here it is.
> >
> >
> >
> > Tracy
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com> ]
> On
> > Behalf Of Rick Winscot
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:38 PM
> > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Loop thru XML data
> >
> >
> >
> > You wanna use e4x? Huh? Huh? Go ahead make my day.
> >
> >
> >
> > dg.dataProvider = xml.destinationcodecolumns.elements("code");
> >
> >
> >
> > Rick *no loops required* Winscot
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com> ]
> On
> > Behalf Of markgoldin_2000
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:43 PM
> > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Loop thru XML data
> >
> >
> >
> > I have the following xml fragment:
> > <root>
> > <destinationcodecolumns>
> > <code>3700</code>
> > <code>4400</code>
> > <code>3400</code>
> > <code>3500</code>
> > </destinationcodecolumns>
> >
> > ....
> >
> > I need to loop thru code element in order to create a grid with
> dynamic
> > columns. How does the loop might look like?
> >
> > Thanks for help.
> >
>
