Well, they would all point to the same Cairngorm/UM Cairngorm SWC (that lives in the library project) but yes, you would have a model, services, etc in each project. The resulting swf is built using -link-report/-load-externs to optimize the inclusion of classes though so you don't have unnecessary bloat.
Having each module be self-contained (as much as a module can be) isn't really possible if its relying on a base app for model, services, etc. Ben --- In [email protected], João <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ben, > > but that would mean that I would have a lot of code duplicated for > each module, right? In this case, the cairngorm source (or, at least, > the singletons). Am I right? > It doesn't seem a good practice to me... what do you think? > > João Saleiro >
