First, do away with the collections and just try it with XML.  XML works
extremely well with Tree, since it is inherently hierarchical.  Nested
collections add a level of complexity you probably do not need.

 

Tracy

 

________________________________

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rafael Faria
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:13 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Showroot - Tree control

 

any help?! im really tight on it. =/

Thanks
Raf

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
, "Rafael Faria"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <!-- dpcontrols/TreeSimple.mxml -->
> <mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
<http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml> ">
> <mx:Tree id="tree1" labelField="@label" showRoot="false" width="160">
> <mx:XMLListCollection id="MailBox">
> <mx:XMLList>
> <folder label="Mail">
> 
> </folder>
> </mx:XMLList>
> </mx:XMLListCollection>
> </mx:Tree>
> </mx:Application>
> 
> Whenever i have just 1 node (that is the root one) on the XML it
> doesnt matter if i set the attribute showRoot="false" because it keep
> showing.
> 
> I need to keep the root to not show on my tree.
> 
> 
> if i do
> 
> 
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <!-- dpcontrols/TreeSimple.mxml -->
> <mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml
<http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml> ">
> <mx:Tree id="tree1" labelField="@label" showRoot="false" width="160">
> <mx:XMLListCollection id="MailBox">
> <mx:XMLList>
> <folder label="Mail">
> <folder label="INBOX"/>
> <folder label="Personal Folder">
> <Pfolder label="Business" />
> <Pfolder label="Demo" /> 
> <Pfolder label="Personal" isBranch="true" /> 
> <Pfolder label="Saved Mail" /> 
> </folder>
> <folder label="Sent" />
> <folder label="Trash" />
> </folder>
> </mx:XMLList>
> </mx:XMLListCollection>
> </mx:Tree>
> </mx:Application>
> 
> 
> The "Mail" one its not there...
> 
> i cant filter, or delete, or whatever... i just need it to work
> exactly how it work on the second example, but whenever i dont have
> the nodes after the root i just want to show a blank tree.
> 
> The reason i need to keep root is because i have a drag and drop the
> needs to keep the root on it.
> 
> anyone can explain why in the first example even though i set
> showroot="false" it still show it?!
> 
> thanks
>

 

Reply via email to