It's a standard List component.
--- In [email protected], "Tracy Spratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is the dataProvider? What data type?
>
> Tracy
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of jmfillman
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: itemRender Debug Warnings
>
>
>
> Thank you for the reply Tracy!
>
> So instead of adding the items to the list as an Object I
> should......?
>
> var objDG:Object = {itemID: myID, index: myAC[myID].id, display:
> gridDisplay, toolTip: tipText};
>
> myList.dataProvider.addItem(objDG);
>
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> , "Tracy Spratt" <tspratt@> wrote:
> >
> > Neither Array nor Object are bindable, they do not dispatch the
> > necessary events. Wrap your Array in an ArrayCollection.
> >
> >
> >
> > One other cause of this warning is when you have a bindable
object
> that
> > you reference through a property typed as Object, as with
> selectedItem,
> > currentItem, data, getRepeaterItem(), etc. In that case you can
> convert
> > or cast the Object to the true data type to prevent the warnings.
> >
> >
> >
> > Tracy
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
>
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> ] On
> > Behalf Of jmfillman
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:14 PM
> > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [flexcoders] itemRender Debug Warnings
> >
> >
> >
> > Since implementing some itemRenderers, I've been getting
warnings,
> in
> > Debug mode, that read like this:
> >
> > warning: unable to bind to property 'display' on class 'Object'
> (class
> > is not an IEventDispatcher)
> >
> > From what I've been able to find on the www, is that this is
> related to
> > setting RemoteObject results to an array, like this:
> >
> > myAC.source = event.result as Array;
> >
> > Question is, how to I do this correctly to prevent all those
> warnings?
> >
>