Check rowCount and rowHeight.  If you explicitly set rowCount, the
rowHeight grows

 

________________________________

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of burttram
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 8:59 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Tree node height problem on initial load

 

bump. Anybody have any ideas on how to go about even troubleshooting
this?

Thanks in advance for any help you guys can provide - I'm kind of
stuck in a jam on this one - anybody ever seen a similar problem in
their own work?

-Brian

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
, "burttram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a component I'm developing to, among other things, accept an
> XMLListCollection as a dataProvider (the data is being supplied via a
> remote object call, which is why I've elected to extend a component to
> handle the reopening /drag&drop, etc).
> 
> Best I can tell I've got working great, vice one issue that I just
can't
> seem to resolve. Essentially, the first time the component loads it
> shows the nodes in the tree at an apparently random height that is
> significantly "taller" than what my normal tree node height should be.

> It would appear that the nodes are being spaced evenly across an
> arbitrary height of the tree which is greater in height than the
"100%"
> I've specified for the tree to take up inside it's container.
> 
> I've included a screenshot of the behavior here, the left-hand image
is
> the initial, jacked up state, and the right-hand image is the very
same
> component instance after the contents are loaded the second time:
> 
> http://www.2b-studios.com/xmlTreeView_Problem.png
<http://www.2b-studios.com/xmlTreeView_Problem.png> 
> <http://www.2b-studios.com/xmlTreeView_Problem.png
<http://www.2b-studios.com/xmlTreeView_Problem.png> >
> 
> Any help you guys might be able to provide would be so very much
> appreciated, I've been beating my head against the wall on this for
> hours now.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Brian
>

 

Reply via email to