>When I take off the 100%, it is a lot smaller on the left hand side of the screen (not using the full width of the tabBar).
Yes, but are the extra pixels still there? This could be a case of mismatched explicit dimensions (list and itemRenderer), or a mix between explicit and percentage based measure/layout. Was interested to see what happens when you test out the different combinations. -TH --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By debugging a simple test case. Can you make one and post it? > > > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Amy > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:07 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Extra pixels on right side of TileList. > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > , "Tim Hoff" TimHoff@ wrote: > > > > > > Hi Amy, > > > > Just a thought, but what happens if you take width="100%" off of the > > tile list, or set the width and columnWidth to explicit values? Does > > the extra space still show up? And, did you try Alex's suggestion to > > add paddingRight="0" to the tile list? Because of the bindings and > > itemRenderers, its not possible to fiddle with your example directly. > > Oh, and you might want to take out the extra period on the right side > of > > the screenshot link. :) > > paddingLeft and paddingRight are ignored. I tried setting them to some > really high number just to see, and nothing happened. > > When I take off the 100%, it is a lot smaller on the left hand side of > the screen (not using the full width of the tabBar). But one of the > reasons I like Flex is because it has the capability of liquid layouts > similar to HTML. I guess I should be thankful that Flex automatically > got that close, even though the native size of the itemRenderer is > smaller... > > How do most people handle this sort of problem? > > -Amy >
