Hi,
Did you successfully conntect the policy server with flash?
I connected the policy server in Flex builder3 debug mode, but when i move the 
swf (include in html page) into tomcat(8080 port), and visit the page, the 
flash debugger saying "Errot 2044: unhandled SecurityErrorEvent. security sand 
box conflict , http://localhost:8080/xmlsocket/XmlSocketCon.swf can not load 
data from localhost:843 "

initially i started the socket server and  the debugger saying these, then, i 
stop the socket server, the error is the same.why?

any suggestion will be greate appreatiate!

 --------------------------------------------------
lwz7512
Ultrapower Flex Team Leader
OpenRIA -- A Window You Exploring RIA World
http://www.openria.cn



----- Original Message ----
From: e_baggg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 12:06:55 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Socket HTTP/1.1 connection not closed even after 
Response is sent


I finally got it working. No matter what, the Flash player makes a
request to port 843 asking for the cross-domain. ..even if you call
Security.loadPolicy File(). I found a source example where a Java
socket (which I kicked off in a shell script) listens on port 843 and
returns the policy file. So, I therefore never need to call
Security.loadPolicy (). Here's the link to that library. You need to
make sure this port is open on your firewall which is easily testable
with a telnet call. This port 843 method is actually the recommended
way to do it according to Adobe.

http://www.flash- resources. net/

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Josh McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let us know how it works. It's really a painful process really,
there's got
> to be a better way to secure the player against attacks without
requiring
> funky custom sockets needing being opened :(
> 
> -Josh
> 
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:08 AM, e_baggg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> 
> >   After thoroughly reading the Adobe socket policy docs, it looks like
> > I'm going to have to open up port 843 and serve the new
> > crossdomain. xml that way. Even though I have it on my root and call
> > Security.loadPolicy () on it (and I see in the logger that it accepts
> > it), it still calls 843, hangs, (b/c it doesn't exist there), than the
> > Flash player throws a security error. Rather frustrating. So it goes.
> > I'm on the debug FP version: WIN 9,0,124,0
> >
> > This crossdomain below is on my root webserver and my app is on port
> > 9080. Even if I move my html and swf to the main root (port 80)..it
> > still fails.
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" ?>
> > <!DOCTYPE cross-domain- policy SYSTEM
> > "http://www.adobe. com/xml/dtds/ cross-domain- policy.dtd">
> > <cross-domain- policy>
> > <site-control permitted-cross- domain-policies= "master-only" />
> > <allow-access- from domain="*" to-ports="8080- 9080"/>
> > </cross-domain- policy>
> >
> >
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com <flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com>,
"Josh
> > McDonald" <dznuts@> wrote:
> > >
> > > You can set any headers you like so long as they're specified in
your
> > > crossdomain. xml, and they're not on the "banned" list.
> > >
> > > Details:
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
http://www.adobe. com/devnet/ flashplayer/ articles/ flash_player9_ security_ 
update.html# policy_file
> > >
> > > Baninanted headers:
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
http://kb.adobe. com/selfservice/ viewContent. do?externalId= kb403030& 
sliceId=1
> > >
> > > AFAIK jsessionid is a cookie and the browser should be putting it in
> > to any
> > > request made from Flex via HttpService. You may have the one Flash
> > Player
> > > version (apparently 9.0.115.0) that blocks Authorization header
info.
> > >
> > > -Josh
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:20 PM, e_baggg <e_baggg@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am doing hand-rolled GETs because Flex (HttpService) cannot pass
> > > > headers (ie jessionid). Thus, I need to open my own
flash.net.Socket
> > > > and write/read the request/response manually. It works great with
> > > > Digest authorization except for this policy issue. I suppose I
can get
> > > > around this making the login page a JSP and make the redirect
go to
> > > > the swf html page...and from there use HttpService. ...but
still I hate
> > > > hacks. Such a shame this policy stuff is such a nightmare. I
followed
> > > > the Adobe docs exactly and I still have issues. I'll work on
this more
> > > > and report back anything I find.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com
<flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com><flexcoders%
> > 40yahoogroups. com>,
> >
> > "Josh
> > > > McDonald" <dznuts@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, maybe we should look at the root of the problem - what
is it
> > > > you're
> > > > > actually trying to do via sockets and hand-rolled GETs that you
> > can't do
> > > > > with httpService?
> > > > > -Josh
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Josh McDonald <josh@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > You'll have to use something like Charles to listen to
what Flash
> > > > player is
> > > > > > doing behind your back for the policy file to be sure, but
if you
> > > > try and
> > > > > > open a socket to somedomain.com: 9080, I believe Flash is
going to
> > > > look for
> > > > > > somedomain.com: 80/crossdomain. xml - Flash doesn't know that
> > the socket
> > > > > > you're connecting to is a http server, so it only knows to
> > look in the
> > > > > > default location, and it's not going to get your
crossdomain file
> > > > if it's on
> > > > > > the server listening on 9080.
> > > > > > Like I said, check with Charles to be sure, but it would make
> > > > sense to me
> > > > > > at least.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Josh
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, e_baggg <e_baggg@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I spoke too soon. The 3 second delay still exists and when I
> > set up
> > > > > >> the Swf policy file debugger for Windows...the Flash player
> > outputs
> > > > > >> this. My concern is that first warning. According to the
docs,
> > > > calling
> > > > > >> Security.loadPolicy File() to the domain and port (which line
> > 2 says
> > > > > >> happened ok) should fix everything. I just updated my
Windows XP,
> > > > > >> which I read somewhere upgrades the flash player. I still
> > have the
> > > > > >> debug version though. This is all a mess to me.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
> > http://my.domain. com:9080/ xms-app/xms. swf
> > > > > >> OK: Policy file accepted:
> > http://my.domain. com:9080/ crossdomain. xml
> > > > > >> Warning: Timeout on xmlsocket:// my.domain. com:843 (at 3
seconds)
> > > > while
> > > > > >> waiting for socket policy file. This should not cause any
> > problems,
> > > > > >> but see http://www.adobe. com/go/strict_ policy_files for an
> > > > explanation.
> > > > > >> Warning: [strict] Requesting socket policy file from
> > > > > >> xmlsocket:// my.domain. com:9080 due to socket connection
> > request from
> > > > > >> SWF at http://my.domain. com:9080/ xms-app/xms. swf. See
> > > > > >> http://www.adobe. com/go/strict_ policy_files if this causes
> > problems.
> > > > > >> Warning: Timeout on xmlsocket:// my.domain. com:9080 (at 3
seconds)
> > > > > >> while waiting for socket policy file. This should not
cause any
> > > > > >> problems, but see http://www.adobe. com/go/strict_ policy_files
> > for an
> > > > > >> explanation.
> > > > > >> Warning: SWF from http://my.domain. com:9080/ xms-app/xms. swf
> > will be
> > > > > >> permitted to connect to a socket in its own domain without a
> > policy
> > > > > >> file. This configuration is deprecated. See
> > > > > >> http://www.adobe. com/go/strict_ policy_files to fix this
problem.
> > > > > >> Warning: SWF from http://my.domain. com:9080/ xms-app/xms. swf
> > will be
> > > > > >> permitted to connect to a socket in its own domain without a
> > policy
> > > > > >> file. This configuration is deprecated. See
> > > > > >> http://www.adobe. com/go/strict_ policy_files to fix this
problem.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com
<flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com>
> > <flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com><flexcoders%
> > > > 40yahoogroups. com>,
> > > > > >> "e_baggg" <e_baggg@> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Actually, I stand corrected. Once I added in my port #
to the
> > > > > >> > cross-domain. ..it worked. Thanks again gang! Big help!
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > <cross-domain- policy>
> > > > > >> > <allow-access- from domain="*" to-ports="9080, 8080"/>
> > > > > >> > </cross-domain- policy>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > --- In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com<flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com>
> > <flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com><flexcoders%
> > > > 40yahoogroups. com>,
> > > > > >> "e_baggg" <e_baggg@> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thanks for your response...I have a full access cross
domain
> > > > on my
> > > > > >> > > server and loading it via Security.loadPolicy File() does
> > > > nothing as
> > > > > >> > > well. Hmm...
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > <cross-domain- policy>
> > > > > >> > > <allow-access- from domain="*"/>
> > > > > >> > > </cross-domain- policy>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > --- In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com<flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com>
> > <flexcoders% 40yahoogroups. com><flexcoders%
> >
> > > > 40yahoogroups. com>,
> > > >
> > > > > >> å`¨æŒ¯å(R)‡ <zhenyu.zhou@ > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > When you use a socket or xmlsocket in a remote swf
file,
> > > > > >> > > > flashplayer would send a policy-request to the server.
> > > > > >> > > > Check
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> >
http://www.adobe. com/devnet/ flashplayer/ articles/ fplayer9_ security_ 04.html
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > When you run it locally, flashplayer won't do this.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > I'm not sure if this is the reason.
> > > > > >> > > > Maybe you should call Security.loadPolicy File()
yourself
> > > > and let
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > > server give it a correct respond.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Josh McDonald wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > It sounds to me like your server is simply
holding the
> > > > > >> > connection for
> > > > > >> > > > > a few seconds in order to prevent brute-force
password
> > > > attacks.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > -Josh
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:23 AM, e_baggg <e_baggg@
> > > > > >> > > > > <mailto:e_baggg@ >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > This is baffling me. For authentication reasons, I am
> > doing
> > > > > >> > all my
> > > > > >> > > > > HTTP traffic via a custom flash.net.Socket where I
> > create and
> > > > > >> > > parse
> > > > > >> > > > > the HTTP request/response myself (using Digest
> > > > authorization) .
> > > > > >> > > > > Everything works fine when I run the generated
> > html/swf files
> > > > > >> > > locally,
> > > > > >> > > > > but once I deploy them to the unprotected part of a
> > > > > >> > webserver, the
> > > > > >> > > > > response connection is not dropped by the server for
> > several
> > > > > >> > > seconds.
> > > > > >> > > > > I do a GET and receive the 401 immediately. ..send the
> > > > same GET
> > > > > >> > > request
> > > > > >> > > > > again with the Digest info. I receive the correct
> > response
> > > > > >> > > from the
> > > > > >> > > > > server immediately but the socket is not closed for 4
> > seconds
> > > > > >> > > by the
> > > > > >> > > > > server. Has anyone seen this?
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > I have "Connection: close" in my request but the
> > socket is
> > > > > >> > > still kept
> > > > > >> > > > > open. If I access this URI via browser URL bar,
the delay
> > > > > >> is not
> > > > > >> > > > > there. I sniffed the packets and even if I mimic the
> > request
> > > > > >> > > String
> > > > > >> > > > > exactly, the socket still hangs for 4 seconds. I
> > suspect I
> > > > > >> > am not
> > > > > >> > > > > closing the socket request, though '\r\n\r\n' seems
> > to be the
> > > > > >> > > standard
> > > > > >> > > > > (and it works when it runs locally). Any ideas???
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Here is my exact request that hangs though the 200
> > > > response is
> > > > > >> > > > > received immediately:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > GET /myapp/mydata. xml HTTP/1.1\r\n
> > > > > >> > > > > Host: www.mydomain. com <http://www.mydomain .com>\r\n
> > > > > >> > > > > Content-Type: application/ x-www-form- urlencoded\ r\n
> > > > > >> > > > > Keep-Alive: 1\r\n
> > > > > >> > > > > Connection: close\r\n
> > > > > >> > > > > Cookie:
JSESSIONID=8CCB32BB EDB875F082709FE1 7AA93679; \r\n
> > > > > >> > > > > Authorization: Digest username="user1" ,
realm="MYAPP" ,
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> >
nonce="MTIxMzEyODYw OTE0MDo1Njg5NTll YTUxMDYyN2VmNGNm MjViMTA4MDFiMDRj MA==",
> > > > > >> > > > > uri="/myapp/ mydata.xml" ,
> > > > > >> > > response="1175bbe7d 5840a0d94fb5de3e f16a2a3",
> > > > > >> > > > > qop=auth, nc=1, cnonce="0a4f113b" \r\n\r\n
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > --
> > > > > >> > > > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell
tolls. It
> > > > tolls for
> > > > > >> > > thee."
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> > > > > >> > > > > :: 0437 221 380 :: josh@ <mailto:josh@ >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It
tolls for
> > > > thee."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> > > > > > :: 0437 221 380 :: josh@
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It
tolls for
> > > > thee."
> > > > >
> > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> > > > > :: 0437 221 380 :: josh@
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for
> > thee."
> > >
> > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> > > :: 0437 221 380 :: josh@
> > >
> >
> > 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for
thee."
> 
> :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

    


      

Reply via email to