That's reassuring to know that I won't have to worry about limits 
there.  The local db is just a copy of the remote - but if the remote 
connection is down, the user can use the local copy until connection 
is reastablished.  

Do you know if a user can view the DB outside of the AIR 
application?  Like, can they find mydb.db and open up the file to see 
the data? 

Thanks. 

--- In [email protected], Maciek Sakrejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> SQLite scales to a couple of terabytes, so you shouldn't be hitting
> limits there, but I'm not sure how you plan to set up the rest of 
the
> architecture (that is, if the local db is not just a copy of the 
remote,
> what's in it?). Also, I'm not sure how well AIR deals with massive
> SQLite databases (that is, even if SQLite itself has no issues, AIR
> might not like that much data for whatever silly reason--you should
> probably try this out with dummy data before deciding on 
architecture).
> 
> -- 
> Maciek Sakrejda
> Truviso, Inc.
> http://www.truviso.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LazerWonder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] SQLite and AIR
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:40:52 -0000
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I know this group is about flex development, but I have a question 
> abuot AIR and SQLite and I don't know which group to post this in 
(I 
> can't seem to find another yahoo group specifically for AIR. So, I 
> apologize if there is one and I'm too blind to see it.)
> 
> Anyways, I need to convert a current Flex-app into an AIR app 
> that's "occasionally online" capable. That is, when the AIR app 
> knows that there's connectivity, it would work with the remote 
> database. However, if connectivity is lost, then the app would 
> seamlessly switch over to "offline" mode and use the local DB, and 
> when the Internet is restored, the local DB would sync with the 
> remote DB. 
> 
> I hope that's clear. Now, my question is: How would I go about 
> implementing this? I know that AIR has an implementation of SQLite. 
> How "lite" is lite? The remote DB is just under 1G and will only 
> grow over the years. Will SQLite be able to handle? Will AS3 be 
> able to handle that amount of data? The alternate solution is to 
> create a small client-db-server architecture right on the user's 
> machine. This would take up a lot more resources, I believe, but it 
> would be easier to implement since it would be a matter of 
switching 
> from "remote" server to "local" server. 
> 
> If anyone has any ideas, please let me know. Thank you!
>


Reply via email to