>From a technology perspective everything will be fine, just users without the >charts license will see the watermark. From a licensing perspective, if you >all are working on the same application and that application uses charts, you >all should have an FB Pro license. Just pass the cost on to your client :-)
Matt On 7/3/08 8:21 AM, "Richard Rodseth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The others will see the charts with watermarks on them. If you have a centralized build machine, it will need a copy of the license installed so that the deployed SWF doesn't have the watermarks. I'm not sure of the legal details (i.e. whether you need to purchase a separate license for your build machine). On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, João <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:joao.saleiro%40webfuel.pt> > wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question that might be a common problem. > > Imagine a team of 8 people, each of them with a copy of FB 3 standard, > working on the same project using source control to synchronize code. > > Now imagine a client that wants a sales chart on a specific view of > the project. I will be the only guy working on that chart, so I have > to buy at least one FB Professional license. > > Now, what I am afraid of is... what will happen when I synchronize my > code with the rest of the team? Will they have their code broken ? Is > it necessary that everyone has FB Professional in a situation like > this, where only one guy will be coding with the charting components? > > Thanks, > > João Saleiro > >
