Douglas,
The remote object path is used in the Flex app and therefor if its hard
coded it doesn't that get compiled? I think the flash vars is a nice way of
doing. I just threw in an initialize event, check to see if it existed and
if not set it and pass that path on to my views.
private function loadFlashVars():void {
// load flash vars
_ropath = Application.application.parameters.ropath;
if(_ropath == null){
// must be development
_ropath = "MyProject.src.cfc";
}
}
This works for me but I am open to any suggestions, Im still learning.
Thank You
Dan Vega
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danvega.org
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> why not keep the paths the same? Either directly or through
> application.cfc.
>
> DK
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Dan Vega <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]<danvega%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > I have a quick questions about Remote Objects & ColdFusion paths. For the
> > latest project I am working on the development took place on my local
> > machine. I would have many remote calls similar to the following.
> >
> > <mx:RemoteObject id="Clients" destination="ColdFusion"
> > source="MyProject.src.cfc.Clients" showBusyCursor="true">
> > <mx:method name="listClients" result="listClients(event)"/>
> > </mx:RemoteObject>
> >
> > The problem that I am running into is that when i want to push a release
> > build the source path is going to change. When its published the path
> looks
> > more like this
> >
> > +projectroot
> > +myproject
> > -myswf.swf
> > +cfc
> > -Clients.cfc
> >
> >
> > My question is what do others do about this. I know that in the web world
> I
> > could read a config file based on live or dev. The problem is that
> through
> > out this project I have really learned that I need to stop thinking in
> terms
> > of "basic web application development".
> >
> > Thank You
> > Dan Vega
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <danvega%40gmail.com>
> > http://www.danvega.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Douglas Knudsen
> http://www.cubicleman.com
> this is my signature, like it?
>
>
