Yes, I think you can specify the name of the class as you did. Not sure if it gets further decorated or what happens if you have a collision of names.
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: new Component() ? If you have: <mx:Component id="inlineEditor" className="MyClass"> <mx:Canvas/> </mx:Component> You get a subclass of Canvas named MyClass, and a local public scoped instance of an IFactory called inlineEditor, right? -Josh On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: If you've defined a component via <mx:Component>, the name is auto-generated as Josh says, but it generates an IFactory, so you can use the factory to get new instances <mx:List id="myList> <mx:itemRenderer> <mx:Component> <mx:Canvas> .. >From AS: myList.itemRenderer.newInstance() ________________________________ From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of rafaelrfc00 Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:53 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: new Component() ? Text was just an example. It can be date, text, textarea, some other customcomponents. I was just curious how i would create item renderes without creating a file. I thought if you are able to use <mx:component> you would be able to create it from actionscript as well. guess i was wrong. Flex didn't think about everything, do they? :P raf --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Josh McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well no, you can't do what you're asking :) > > When you use: > > <mx:component> > <canvas> > ... > </canvas> > </mx:component> > > It's creating a new subclass of Canvas with a generated name, and you can't > create new classes at run-time without bytecode manipulation (which isn't > really an option in Flex yet unfortunately). > > But what exactly are you trying to achieve? If you're just displaying text, > but it needs to be different to the field data, what you need is a > labelFunction, not an itemRenderer. > > -Josh > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Rafael Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > How do you mean about putting some getters? Can you give me an example? > > > > Thanks > > Raf > > > > > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Pedro Sena" <sena.pedro@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > > > What do u think of put some getters in your object instead of create > > various > > > item renderers that just have little funcionality ? > > > > > > Just my 2 cents > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt> > > Search Archives: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo <http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo> ! Groups > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
