Also, I think you'd get a compiler error, but it should be noted that internal components should not be [Bindable].
right?
On 8/9/06, Dominick Accattato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remember to keep your bindable properties inline with your public interface.A few more to be excluded from [Bindable]:Constantsprivate properties should only be bindable through getters.temporary vars (counter, i, j, k, etc) <-- obviousand as Peter mentioned.. any internals (configs and such)anything else?Dominick Accattato, CTONew View NetworksOn 8/9/06, Peter Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Most should probably be bindable. Things that I would consider "configuration" properties that are unlikely to change, might not need to be bindable. That category would include things like tabIndex, but not really very many others..
Peter
On 8/9/06, Michael Schmalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi,
Anybody care to shed light on when you would consider a component property Bindable?
I understand obviously the effects of what a bindable property is but, Adobe, what are your guidlines for declaring a property bindable in your components?
At times my head says, most could be bindable.
Peace, Mike
--
What goes up, does come down.
__._,_.___![]()
SPONSORED LINKS
Custom software development Database development software Embedded software development Offshore software development Software development
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcomponents" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
__,_._,___
- [flexcomponents] [Bindable] :: Making a component G-S P... Michael Schmalle
- Re: [flexcomponents] [Bindable] :: Making a compon... Peter Hall
- Re: [flexcomponents] [Bindable] :: Making a co... Dominick Accattato
- Re: [flexcomponents] [Bindable] :: Making ... Dominick Accattato
- Re: [flexcomponents] [Bindable] :: Making ... Michael Schmalle
- Re: [flexcomponents] [Bindable] :: Making a co... Michael Schmalle
Reply via email to
