That's good to know. I was wary of it because I thought this might have been the source of my problem in the past but appreciate you helping me clear that up.
Josh Tynjala wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been using that same system for helper classes in custom > components for some time now without any problems. I have some custom > lists that place classes in com.joshtynjala.controls.listClasses.*, and > they always appear in Flex Builder's code completion system. > > Josh > > diamondTearz wrote: > > > > > Josh- I think that's the detail I might have been missing. I think I was > attributing the effect to maybe the way the classes were named. Have you > named some classes with suffixes like "myviewClasses" and had normal > behavior from them in the editor? > > Mani > > Josh Tynjala wrote: > > I have not noticed any different behavior with the code completion > > system when dealing with packages named with camcel case. However, > you > > may have noticed that some classes in these packages don't appear > > within the code completion system. This is actually because the > classes > > themselves use the [ExcludeClass] metadata and has nothing to do > with > > the package name. > > > > Josh > > > > diamondTearz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think the convention when naming packages is usually to use al > > lowercase > > which is why this difference caught my eye. It seemed to me that > using a > > capital letter in naming the package made my code completion > behave > > differently. This is something I did a couple of weeks ago so my > recall > > may be foggy on it- I was looking at creating some support classes > for > > my > > components and wanted to make sure that I knew why they used this > in > > naming > > their packages. > > > > Michael Labriola wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mani, > > > > > > By convention, all classes in ActionScript start with an > uppercase > > > > > character and are camel case. > > > > > > So: > > > > > > DataGrid > > > SomeComponent > > > > > > variable names also tend to be camel case, with a lower > case first > > > > > letter. So, I would wager the packages are simply an > extension of > > > this concept. > > > > > > It is a convention though, not a rule, so, I am not sure > why you > > > would see any difference. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > --- In [email protected] > , > > diamondTearz > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> Does the camel case naming of the packages in the > components > > in > > > Flex serve a > > >> special purpose? For example listClasses instead > > > of "listclasses". I was > > >> wondering if naming them that way did something. > I noticed > > that > > > it seemed > > >> to have an effect on my code completion but would > like to know > > > > > more. > > >> > > >> Mani > > >> > > >> -- > > >> View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Why-do-the- > > > > > Actionscript-display-class-packages-have-camelcase-in-their-naming-- > > > > tf3497273.html#a9768345 > > >> Sent from the Flex Component Development mailing > list archive > > at > > > Nabble.com. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/Why-do-the-Actionscript-display-class-packages-have-camelcase-in-their-naming--tf3497273.html#a9768801 > > > > Sent from the Flex Component Development mailing list archive at > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Why-do-the-Actionscript-display-class-packages-have-camelcase-in-their-naming--tf3497273.html#a9772406 > > Sent from the Flex Component Development mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-do-the-Actionscript-display-class-packages-have-camelcase-in-their-naming--tf3497273.html#a9772828 Sent from the Flex Component Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
