When it is open source (soon), you'll be free to do that. - Gordon ________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bjorn Schultheiss Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [flexcomponents] Re: Private vs Protected I think someone needs to distribute a version of the SDK where all instances of private has been replaced with protected ;) On 15/06/2007, at 11:38 AM, Bjorn Schultheiss wrote: On 15/06/2007, at 11:25 AM, reflexactions wrote: For a trully extensible framework that is supposed to form the basis of this whole platform it shouldnt be left that developers need to justify WHY something should be protected, it should be for the framework author to justify WHY something is private. I love it!!! That 'play it safe' line was lame. Use that one for the boss but not for us, the poor devs who might actually need to reference the private member. regards, Bjorn
