Ah great, thanks for your reply. So should the namespaces for a regular page
generally look like this?
xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
xmlns:fx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/halo">
Cheers,
Baz
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:57 PM, cksachdev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Baz,
> The skinning framework in flex 4 is called spark. So essentially all the
> components inheriting from SkinnableComponent(Base class for a spark
> component) are in library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark. you can give it any
> namespace prefix. Initially the namespace is 's'. It will look like
> xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex.spark". Gumbo is the code name for
> flex 4, similar to Moxie of Flex 3. Hope this clears your doubt.
>
> --
> Chetan Sachdev
> http://www.riageeks.com
>
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcomponents%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Baz <thinkl...@...> wrote:
> >
> > I've been playing around with Flex 4 (build 6192) and it seems that the
> > namespaces have changed a lot since previous builds. I only say this
> because
> > none of the examples online seem to work. After lots of mucking around, I
> > was able to get the following test application with these namespaces to
> run:
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> > <fx:Application
> > xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
> > xmlns:fx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
> > xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/halo">
> >
> > <mx:VBox>
> > <fx:Button label="Gumbo Button"/>
> > <mx:Button label="Halo Button" />
> >
> > <fx:ButtonBar id="orangeToggleBar" requiresSelection="true">
> > <fx:dataProvider>
> > <fx:ArrayCollection source="[Flash, Director, Catalyst,
> > ColdFusion]" />
> > </fx:dataProvider>
> > </fx:ButtonBar>
> > </mx:VBox>
> > </fx:Application>
> >
> > The FX namespace pointing to spark doesn't seem to be right, shouldn't it
> be
> > SP or S with FX as a separate space? Also, what about the
> > ns.adobe.com/flex/GUMBO library, is that gone? I saw it a lot online but
> I
> > think it may have been combined into the main (unnamed) namespace, what
> do
> > you think?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Baz
> >
>
>
>
