Background   -  SDR 2.19 RC1,  Win NT, SP 3.  E6600 quad core, 4 GB, DPC
usually 92 ms, Safe Mode 1.  Running  SDR, FLdigi, WaveNode WN-2 monitor,
Ham Call lookup.
Rig is a Flex5000A with ATU (bypassed), 2 receivers and V/U unit.

I normally just use RX1, I was switching between 15 and 17 meters, dropped
to 160 just to check things out.  The band switch seemed to take much longer
than normal (perhaps half a second), and what looks like a broadcast AM with
digital sidebands (10 kc either side) was just above the passband in the
middle of 160.  I could not tune to the station. VFO would move, the
panadapter would jump a bit but not enough to get the station into a
listenable range. Moving just the MHz position on VFO A, from 0 to 65 MHz,
the station stayed in almost the same spot (as I tuned up frequency, the
station would move down the scope perhaps 300 Hz for every MHz up). This
worked from 0 to 12 MHz, then at 13 MHz, the signal bounded back up the
scope a couple of KHz. and again moved down a bit with each until 24 MHz.

I tried RX2, and RX2 works properly, the ham bands look like they normally
do.  I can sync the VFOs, and see to completely different displays.

I have had a couple of things that seem related before, and I expect that a
power cycle of the Flex will cure the problem for a while. I power cycled
twice last night in 6 hours, but with this event this morning which I am
playing with it trying. to figure things out.

So, 3 questions

1.  How can I get signals from RX2 to FLdigi?  I have RX2 on the external
speakers but I it does not connect to FLdigi.

 2. Should I fall back to 1.86?

3.  Is this a hardware issue, how can I tell?

Thanks,

Ken Akin
AC0HO
_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.

Reply via email to