On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Brian Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Stephen Hicks, N5AC > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Brian, >> >> The real problem here is that even though you could maintain >> synchronization if you were phase-locked to GPS, you would lose coherency. >> There are methods to fix this, but it is complicated and the PC isn't >> going to help with the problem. >> > > Ah, I assumed (silly me) that the timestamps on the samples would be of > sufficiently fine granularity to allow preservation of phase information. > ;-) The phase of what, precisely? If you think about it, the phase of signals themselves is preserved with IQ data and the time stamp of the data tells you when it was collected, but this is not the problem. That's about all I'm willing to say about that. > > Thanks for the information. > > -- > Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL > 3191 Western Dr. > Cameron Park, CA 95682 > [email protected] > +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) > +1.916.877.5067 (USA) > _______________________________________________ Flexedge mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are using beta versions of the software.
