There is no need to remove .NET 1.1 to install .NET 2.0. They coexist
on my Winbows computer (and have for months).
I suggest everyone read carefully about the two. Do not fall into
Microsoft's naming trap. The name .NET is being kept because of the
strong branding/marketing that has gone before. There are huge internal
differences between the strictly managed extensions of .NET 1.X and
the CLI based guts of .NET 2.0. Indeed, the statements on the
Microsoft MSDN offerings are that managed extensions are "deprecated"
under 2.0 for C++ and they specifically state that CLI is the root of
all future development under C++ at least.
Bob
Ignacio Cembreros wrote:
Ignacio Cembreros wrote:
Yes you can, and also I believe that you can use .Net v2 only. I didn“t
checked it myself with SDR, but in my job we use v1.1 and we are transitioning
to v2, and they told me that v2 supports v1.1 programs.
73 de Ignacio, EB4APL
--
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
Laziness is the number one inspiration for ingenuity. Guilty as charged!