Yes, I just went back a few revs and see the same thing. I'm wondering 
if the difference may be using a wide-band noise source vs. a CW tone 
(as in the case of a signal gen.)?

Kirb - VE6IV
-----


Bob Tracy wrote:
> Kirb,
>
> I've seen the same thing for the last few releases but only when the DSP
> buffers are set to 4096, at lower settings the calibration is correct.  I
> have discussed this with Eric but he cannot duplicate it with his equipment.
>
> I calibrate using -73 dBm and consistently get -70 dBm on the meter.
>
> I don't know the answer.
>
> Bob K5KDN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of root [knesbitt]
> Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:59 PM
> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: spam: [Flexradio] v1.9.0 Level Calibration
>
>
> Is it me or is the input level calibration out by 3 dB in v1.9.0 (795)?
> Dumping a -70 dBm into the front end of the SDR (HP 8648C derived)
> equates to -67.0 dBm repeatedly for Pre-amp Gain settings of "low/Med/High".
> Using a new .mdb for this load and have run the Cal routine after
> ensuring the radio is frequency calibrated.
> Thoughts?
>
> 73,
>
> Kirb - VE6IV
>
> --
>
>   


_______________________________________________
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Reply via email to