On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Jim R <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Gerald
> Thanks for the update. You mentioned that the pretty betty GUI will be 
> included in the next release but will the "Classic" flex GUI still be an 
> option. Call me dull, but I kind of like the classic interface. I have used 
> pretty betty but find Some of functions more legible and easier to operate in 
> the classic interface. Don't get me wrong, although pretty betty is a feast 
> for the eyes, my personal preference is the classic interface. If anyone 
> concurs, please speak up. I have stuck my neck out and have "broken the ice". 
> Is it just me?

No Jim, I agree with you 100%. Contrast and edge-definition makes the
controls easier to spot with your eyes. Also anything that leaves more
processing power to the radio functions is strongly to be desired. I
don't want to give up a single CPU cycle to "eye-candy" if I don't
have to.

73 de Brian, WB6RQN/J79BPL


>
>
> Jim
>
> K5HY
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:50:06 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Click tuning with a Locked panadapter operatation
> >
> > We at FlexRadio agree that the locked Panadapter is an important feature to
> > be added to PowerSDR. The most difficult part is to decide how to best
> > implement the control interface. We will implement this capability in the
> > Official Release that will include Pretty Betty and many DSP enhancements
> > such as Wide Band Image Rejection. This release will go into public beta in
> > the first part of August and Official Release in September.
> >
> > In the interim, we plan to do an Official Release based on 1.18.1 next week
> > that has several important DSP improvements such as ALC, AGC, NR, ANF, etc.
> >
> >
> > We appreciate everyone's suggestions as we continue to enhance the features
> > and performance of the radios you already own. We have been doing this for
> > over six years and there is still no shortage of ideas for enhancement.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gerald
> >
> > Gerald Youngblood, K5SDR
> > President
> > FlexRadio Systems
> > 13091 Pond Springs Rd. #250
> > Austin, TX 78729
> > Phone: 512-535-4713
> > www.flex-radio.com
> >
> > "Tune in excitement!" (TM)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Al K0VM
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:26 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Flexradio] Click tuning with a Locked panadapter operatation
> >
> > In various previous e-mails ...
> >
> > ---------------------
> > The one gripe I have is the lack of an ability to lock the panadaptor.
> > Operating this radio is a very visual process, and I would lose the
> > pattern of activity when changing the main rx frequency. I realize I can
> > leave that alone and hunt with the sub-rx, but really it would be
> > desirable to have both freely available. I know this has been talked
> > about before, but I can't remember where to go to add my support to the
> > enhancement list.
> >
> > Overall, a very positive experience.
> >
> > ---------------------
> > and
> > ---------------------
> >> I agree with NU8I's comments on the need to be able to lock the
> > panadapter.
> >>
> >>
> >> Oh, no kidding! This is perhaps the biggest problem of PowerSDR. It
> >> makes click-tune painfully difficult to use. You have to wait a second
> >> or two until the waterfall display starts to repaint in order to see
> >> what is going on and where the signals have moved. If Flex could fix
> >> only one feature this would be it for me!
> >>
> >>
> > -----------------------
> >
> > You can ALMOST do this now... If you wish to TEST DRIVE how this might
> > feel in operation (assumes no RX 2)....
> >
> > 1. Set VFO A to center the pan adapter to the range of interest.
> > 2. Set Multi RX on.. Turn down the VFO A RX volume (right hand vertical
> > slider in MulitRX box )
> > 3. Enable SPLIT and 'show TX filter on Display'
> > 4. Click the RIGHT mouse button twice to get the RED cross hairs in the
> > pan adapter.
> > 5. Click the LEFT mouse button to set VFO B to the signal you wish to
> > listen to.
> > HINT: since most casual and net operation is on 1 Khz or 500 hz
> > intervals, set tune step size to 500.
> >
> > CAVEATS: software limitations:
> > 1. The mouse wheel currently only operates VFO A. To fine tune a signal
> > move your mouse pointer into the VFO B window then use the mouse wheel.
> > 2. Drag tunning can not be used..
> > 3. Only one RX (VFO B) is usable with this demo.
> > 4. Its too easy to drop out of the VFO B ( read cross hair) click tune
> > control mode.
> >
> > CAVEATS: hardware limitations.
> > 1. The Spur Reduction algorithm attempts to avoid DDS spurs in the VFO A
> > RX area (i.e. DDS + 9KHZ if). You may need to toggle RS differently for
> > VFO B RX than for VFO A RX.
> > 2. The RX Image rejection is optimal for VFO A RX (i.e. DDS + 9KHZ if).
> > Image Rejection for VFO B RX may not be as good..
> > ( I am not sure how WBIR effects this observation.)
> > 3. If VFO B RX is tuned to the DDS frequency ( VFO A - 9KHZ if), it will
> > be tuned to the 0KHZ (DC) IF frequency.
> > Each of these hardware Caveats is particularly noticeable with then
> > SDR-1000, not so much noticeable with the F5K ( F3K ?? ) and a
> > non-factor with Mercury HPSDR ( uses DDC, no DDS).
> >
> > Future ???
> > 1. Obviously the demo would be more useful if the mouse wheel could
> > control VFO B.
> > 2. A second level of operability could result from allowing VFO B to
> > control the DDS. Would have mouse wheel control and drag tuning but
> > still only one RX.
> > 3. With two front panel selector buttons, full operation could be
> > achieved...
> > Button one: DDS tracks VFO A ( current normal operation)
> > Button two: Set DDS to current VFO A frequency ( - IF) and freeze it
> > there.
> > Both VFO A and VFO B then control software IF
> > frequencies within the limits of the pan adapter.
> >
> > I would probably not want to run this DEMO in the heat of a contest, but
> > it does give a different feel to the radio.
> > With proper software tweeks, it could be a useful operational option
> > provided the hardware limitations are not objectionable (see caveats above).
> >
> > AL, K0VM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> > Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage:
> > http://www.flex-radio.com/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> > Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: 
> > http://www.flex-radio.com/
> _______________________________________________
> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
> [email protected]
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: 
> http://www.flex-radio.com/

_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

Reply via email to