See my comments in-line below 


-Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Lunday
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:37 PM
To: 'Neal Campbell'; '[email protected]'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Congrats to Flex on Stellar Review of Flex-3000

Thanks, Neal and Tim!



Nice.  Peter's review was very well written, and he did a lot of prep work.
His style of writing is superb.  

Excellent history of how Gerald started the company.  A great example of what a 
vision and hard work can produce, in the same spirit of Apollo 11 (since we're 
celebrating 40th anniversary of the moon landing).  I am honored to be a Flex 
customer, and thank you Gerald and all the Flex Radio staff!


A couple of questions on the review:


1. I thought WBIR was on the F5K only?

[Tim] Nope.  It can be used with all FlexRadio SDRs including the SDR-1000 if 
you manually perform a RX image calibration on each band.  The FLEX-5000 and 
FLEX-3000 have built-in signal generators - part of the BITE (built-in test 
equipment).  More discussion on this can take place on the FlexEdge reflector 
since this feature is still in development.


2. I have tried to receive in the MF range and found myself unable to do so 
because of the lack of selectivity (OK, so with my Kenwood 570 I think I tuned 
in an AM broadcast station three times in 5 years.  Not a big deal, just an 
interesting point)

[Tim] All FlexRadio's SDRs are optimized for the ham bands.  Additional 
filtering will help with the images, but the  radio wasn't designed for 
selectivity down that low in frequency.


3. Something Peter mentions at the end which really hit me upside my thick 
skull - he admitted preferring knobs to keyboard.  Well, thanks to Lee W9OY who 
has been hammering (politely) away at my thick skull with Flex radios, I am 
seeing that it is a paradigm shift...the user either "gets it" in an AHA, OH 
NOW I SEE moment, or the user does not get it.  Trying to compare the radio 
with other traditional rigs is truly comparing apples to oranges, or more like 
a yo-yo to an intertial gyro-scope.  It's not even in the same category.  I 
daresay that labeling the F3K as a "radio" is not only a dis-service and 
understatement, it is...well...inaccurate to a high degree.
It's more like a software-defined communications device and signal processing 
and analysis unit (although SDR is an easier acronym than
SDCD-SPAU!)  The point is that Peter did not convey any AHA, OH NOW I SEE type 
of recognition, but instead did a "here's how it stacks up against other rigs" 
commentary.  That misses the concept, IMHO.  Maybe he conveyed it in the 
earlier review of the 5000, but it does not strike me as such in this article.

[Tim] Grasshopper has achieved Nirvana :-)  Yes, it is like trying to find a 
car's teeth to check its age.  I suspect when transportation changed from 
horses to automobiles, the same problems making comparisons existed.  I presume 
Peter did not want to seem overly biased in his article abs be "overly" 
objective.  Still, it is a good technical review.  I also wouldn't want to have 
to design a marketing strategy around "SDCD-SPAU", but I get the point.



Mark Lunday
WD4ELG
[email protected]
http://wd4elg.net


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Neal Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 6:09 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [Flexradio] Congrats to Flex on Stellar Review of Flex-3000

My current issue of RadCom arrived today (my favorite ham mag) from the RSGB 
and it has a 'Peter Hart' review of the 3000. I have traditionally enjoyed 
Peter Hart's reviews more than any US magazine, he seems to  get to the point 
without a lot of tales of contest adventures, etc. Also, he has reviewed the K3 
and found it to be a great radio, not a radio of the Gods.

If I might quote without getting sued:

"As might be expected, the overall operating experience was similar to the 
FLEX-5000A. I found the on-air performance of the radio very impressive. The 
receiver sounded very clean and low noise. The audio quality is excellent and 
the filter arrangements are really effective.
There is no click when the headphones are connected: this problem with the 
FLEX-5000a has been fixed. The panadapter display adds another dimension to 
tuning and keeps you aware of signals on adjacent channels. DSP noise 
reduction, noise blanking and other receiver features all worked very well 
indeed. I did not experience any problems due to intermodulation or overload 
but images could be heard from strong broadcasters and strong amateur stations. 
The ability to receive on two channels simultaneously in stereo within the IF 
band was excellent, just what is needed for DX split frequency working.

The autio quality on transmit using a Heil Handi Mic HM-5 was excellent and CW 
effective but the fans seemed very noisy.

Its a matter of personal preference how you view the computer keyboard as your 
sole interface to your radio. Some feel it is the way forward, highly flexible 
and features such as point and click tuning enable rapid frequency navigation. 
Others. including myself, prefer the traditional approach with round knobs, 
switches and a good tuning dial.

The Flex-3000 with PowerSDR software is a most impressinve radio.
Although some aspects of performance are not as good as the FLEX-5000a, it is 
nevertheless an excellent performer and a significant price saving over its 
larger brother. There has been a substantial price increase over the last year 
on many US products. The FLEX-3000 is priced at 1395 pounds inc. VAT, almost 
half the current price of the FLEX-5000a with ATU."


Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal Software
Programming Services for Windows, OS X and Linux www.abrohamnealsoftware.com
(540) 242 0911

_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage:
http://www.flex-radio.com/
Message delivered to [email protected]


_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ 
Message delivered to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to