Well, the database definition hasn't changed since 1.8 (i.e. ever), and I
don't think I fixed many bugs in the SqlProvider since 52, so it's likely
not that. But it could be - starting fresh is certainly an interesting
experiment. If nothing else, having a reliable repro would be nice.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helen
Ersando
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:18 PM
To: FlexWiki Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Flexwiki-users] About Flexwiki's Authentication and
Authorization
OK. This may be an artifact of bad data in your database, but only if you're
working with an existing DB built with FW 1.8. I'm assuming you're working
with a fresh copy. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I'll see if I can repro
this against a clean install of 2.0.0.72. I hope to get to this (and the
other bug you reported) today, but it may be later this week, as I've got a
bit of travel coming up.
i have already an existing DB with 2.0.0.52 and it's the same DB i've used
for 2.0.0.72... okay... i will try to start from scratch (clean) with
2.0.0.72... uninstalling everything and not to modify anything... hope to
get it work...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
