> But the feature and intention of the IWikiApplications[string key] > addition doesn't really have a home, that I can tell. Although, this > came out from a fairly trivial feaure, we kinda made a stand and said > "this is how you communicate stuff from the hosted application to the > engine and wikitalk." That seems to be a fairly fundamental thing... > Is inline comment docs enough or is there some other place that this > should go? Or is this email the doc?
Well, I don't really have a strong opinion about this. On the one hand, a wiki is a pretty darn good place to capture informal documentation...as long as someone polices it. Which we don't have. But maybe this is a case where something is better than nothing. Clearly, the code should be commented where it's not crystal clear what's going on. That's just good sense. Beyond that, I don't really have a vision for what I think should happen. Editing the appropriate pages on the wiki is probably pretty reasonable. If nothing else, it's sort of telling if *our* wiki has crappy information in it. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flexwiki-users mailing list Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
