> If this is the correct way to proceed I will complete the changes I am > making to the Attachment Icon stuff and add more configuration tests > by end of day tomorrow.
I don't think I would say this isn't the "correct" way to proceed, but to me there's something slightly aesthetically discordant about this. It seems to me that if the core really is independent of the web app, then the unit tests for the web app ought to be independent of the unit tests for the core. So I'd rather see a FlexWiki.Web.UnitTests project with its own set of tests. Of course, I think I must be insane to make *any* objections to a proposal to add *more* tests to FlexWiki. :) In my opinion, the fact that you've taken the time to do this means you have the moral authority to implement it as you see fit! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flexwiki-users mailing list Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
