> I just didn't put it all together correctly and I can't really see how > to make it any more clear, with the possible exception of making it > very clear that "namespace definition topic" == > "_ContentBaseDefintition".
Yeah, that's my tendency to be pedantic rearing its ugly head. The engine is, in fact, written to allow the name of the definition topic to change (because, let's face it, _ContentBaseDefinition is a pretty bad name in light of the fact that namespaces aren't called "Content Bases" any more). But we'd have to think pretty hard before we changed it, because it would probably break a lot of stuff, so just saying "_ContentBaseDefintion (or whatever your namespace definition topic is)" would probably make the document more readable. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flexwiki-users mailing list Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
