I tested both for our intranet setup a couple years ago in the 1.8 days
(about the time of build 1677). I found the MSSQL unusable compared to
the filesystem. I don't remember the details, but the perf was really
bad in my testing.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Andera
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 6:28 AM
To: 'FlexWiki Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [Flexwiki-users] Which is truly faster? Flat file or
MSSQLServer
I don't think anyone has ever tested. I also suspect it depends on
hardware, the size of your wiki, the load, and whether the SQL Server is
local or remote.
But I'm not even sure the question is meaningful. It's entirely possible
that one is faster for some operations and the other is faster for
others. A better question to ask is, "Which one will handle the load I
need at the response time I require?"
Generally, I'd recommend that people stick with the filesystem
implementation unless they have some reason to use the SQL one.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Astralis Lux
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:23 AM
To: flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flexwiki-users] Which is truly faster? Flat file or MSSQL
Server
This might be a softball question, but when using FlexWiki, which
version is better for performance: flat files or MSSQL Server?
________________________________
Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live. Power up!
<http://www.windowslive.com?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_powerofwindows_112007>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
