* gerard robin -- Thursday 02 October 2008: > I was on going to open directories on CVS for it, and i just notice > that there is yet, an other Stampe-SV4 in it, which is not mine. [...] > AFAIK duplicate models are not whish.
Well, I said at some time that duplicating aircraft should be avoided. But Curt noted that he has no problem with that, so it's OK. Also, back then, it was a special situation: your better SR71 was already in CVS, and someone rushed his (inferior) version in, right after he had gotten CVS write permission. This was totally pointless and annoying. Considering the Stampe-SV4 case ... the version in CVS looks also good, so I'm not sure if we should have another one. (Your livery looks nicer ... :-) At *some* time we might have to decide removing aircraft from CVS if there's a better implementation available. That sounds nasty, but OTOH, we also decide which aircraft should go in. m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
