On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 13:58 +0000, Renk Thorsten wrote: > > just a quick note to this interesting thread ... > > its elsif in nasal , not elseif ... no e > > Thanks. That would explain it ;-) > > > I hope you're not suggesting that C++ is always slower than Nasal? :-) > > Pascal summarized it nicely - we already have ported the important stuff to > C++, so what remains in Nasal is a small fraction of the total performance > cost and we gain little as such by porting that as well. I'm sure the loop > computes even faster in C++, but I don't have the means to measure that. It'd > be intersting though to see how much the difference actually is.
These types of measurements are always great, you can discuss endlessly and all prove to be wrong in the end. Erik PS. calculating geod is always heavy and a wise man once said; the fastest code is the code that doesn't run. This is true both for nasal and for C++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
