[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Probably not a great idea, but certainly no catastrophe either. > > Numerical precision problems are best solved by understanding and > > mitigating them, not clubbing them over the head with extra > > precision. :) > > Very, very true.
The few bit's about numerics that I had at university were already quite interesting... > My concern is that we are using about half floats and half > doubles. I am thinking that there are some cases where very small numbers that > are converted between the two are causing problems. Maybe not. If there are no > *performance* penalties with moving to all doubles I'd be interested in trying > that - *just* to see what happens. Probably nothing will, I'm just curious. Probably you could indentify different precition needs and typedef them your own. E.g. jsbsim_float jasbsim_double and jsbsim_log_double. Then you only need to change one file (and there only 3 lines) to figure out what precition you want or need. CU, Christian -- The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague Whoever that is/was; (c) by Douglas Adams would have been better... _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
