On Sunday 09 December 2001 3:46 am, you wrote: > On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:38, you wrote: > > John Check writes: > > > Yes. FWIW I did find some pix with a fair to middlin' amount of > > > detail http://www.philyoder.com/ > > > > That's a 310R, with a longer nose, more powerful engines and (I > > suspect) turbosupercharging, so there may be some minor differences on > > the panel. Nice pics, though, and a great starting point. > > Maybe it would be a good idea to state exactly which models of which > aircraft we are going to have? This way we are all looking at the same > thing. > > David >
As much as I agree, it'll make for slower going. Theres a lot of variants on anything thats been in production for a while. For cosmetics, we need to take a little artistic license. FWIW I think I was wrong about later models the R II may have actually been the last one produced. Oh well. > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
